UFF Home
UFF Biweekly
United Faculty of Florida -- USF System Chapter
14 July 2016
Email not displaying properly? View it in your browser

Chapter Meeting Tomorrow on Tampa

The UFF USF Chapter will meet tomorrow, Friday, at 12 noon in Temple Terrace, just east of USF Tampa, at CDB Restaurant (5104 E. Fowler Ave., at 51st & E. Fowler). Everyone is invited to the Chapter Meeting. There will be pizza, salad, and drinks.

This will be the last regular chapter meeting this summer. The next chapter meeting will be on the first week of classes, on Friday, August 26, at 12 noon, at CDB Restaurant. The Chapter will then meet on alternate Fridays on campus, at noon, locations to be announced. Have a happy rest of the summer!

Join UFF Today!

Download, fill in, and mail the membership form. Benefits of membership include the right to run and vote in UFF chapter and statewide elections; representation in grievances (UFF cannot represent a non-member in a grievance or litigation); special deals in insurance, travel, legal advice, and other packages provided by our affiliates; free insurance coverage for job-related liability; and the knowledge you are supporting education in Florida. Come and join the movement.


If you have been the victim of a violation of the Collective Bargaining Agreement, you have thirty days from the time you knew or should have known of the violation to file a grievance. If you are, and at the time of the violation were, a dues-paying member of the United Faculty of Florida, you have the right to union representation. To contact the UFF USF Grievance Committee, go to the online contact form. For more information, see our web-page on grievances; see also the main article (left).

Visit Us on Facebook

Visit the United Faculty of Florida at USF Facebook page. This page is a place where UFF members can exchange thoughts and ideas. The page is "public", but only dues-paying UFF members are eligible to post items on the page; it is a group page, so you need a Facebook account to look at it. If you are a UFF member, ask to join on the page, or contact the Communications Committee. The Committee will invite every UFF member that asks to join. So check us out. UFF members are welcome to join, and non-members are welcome to look.


Updates on SCF, Grants, and Tenure

Academic tenure was originally intended to protect teachers and public intellectuals in academia. It has morphed into a brass ring attained only by a minority of faculty. Here are two recent developments on the subject.

  • State College of Florida to Hire for Annual Contracts Only. Five years after the Florida legislature failed to abolish tenure, an incrementalist effort to eliminate tenure in Florida continues. For more, see below or click here.
  • Why Young Researchers Aren't Getting Grants. Grant money is declining just as research universities increasingly rely on grant awards for tenure decisions. The effect is that some of the tenure decision is outsourced to grant agencies. For more, see below or click here.
We note the departure of the Dean of Education and the Dean of Nursing. Administrators come and go, but the union abides.

State College of Florida to Hire for Annual Contracts Only

The Board of Trustees for the State College of Florida (SCF) has taken the final step to put all new faculty hires on annual contracts without protection, effective this fall. This is a likely trial balloon: if it succeeds without too much blowback, other boards of Florida institutions may be tempted to follow suit.

It started last summer, when the board of trustees for the State College of Florida (SCF) decided to eliminate a tenure-like system for faculty, effective this July. (It was proposed by then board member Carlos Beruff, who subsequently resigned and is now running for the U. S. Senate.) SCF had a system of "continuing contracts" in which new faculty served a probationary period and, having satisfied the college, would have their contracts renewed without going through a reappointment process. Faculty with continuing contracts were still required to perform and could still be dismissed for cause, but they could not be dismissed on a whim.

Under the new system, current faculty would keep their continuing contracts but new faculty would get annual contracts, subject to non-reappointment. Both the SCF faculty and administration feared abolishing continuing contracts would complicate hiring and opposed the change. No dice. Then the SCF Senate voted that they had no confidence in the board (the vote was 188 - 2), and there were other protests from the media and the community.

But SCF had no union, hence no collective bargaining agreement protecting continuing contracts. If SCF had had a union, and a collective bargaining agreement with continuing contracts written into it, then the board would not have been able to unilaterally abolish continuing contracts. (Tenure at USF is protected by our Collective Bargaining Agreement.) Some SCF faculty started a "card campaign" to start the process of making the United Faculty of Florida their union.

Perhaps stung by the criticism, and Mr. Beruff having left the board, the Board decided last month to instead convert to multi-year contracts. This proposal was presented as a compromise, and as a system resembling the multi-year contracts of the Florida Gulf Coast University (FGCU). But FGCU's system has tenure-like attributes that the proposal for SCF does not, and faculty were not impressed.

So at a contentious meeting, the Board reverted to their original annual contract plan.

SCF faculty have organized a chapter of the United Faculty of Florida and have submitted a petition signed by 60 % of the faculty for an election to decide whether SCF faculty are to be represented by UFF. This was more than twice as many signatures required to force an election, which should be held soon. If a majority vote in favor, UFF will become the collective bargaining agent for SCF faculty.

Note the relative powerlessness of the SCF administration. Florida college trustees are appointed by the governor (and, as one SCF faculty member observed, "These people were appointed by the governor for a reason"), and the administration serves at the pleasure of the Board. The administration had publicly advised against the innovation, to no avail. It was up to the faculty to defend their institution against board. And that is what the faculty are doing.

Why Young Researchers Aren't Getting Grants

Grant money is tight all around, but some agencies are worrying about young researchers not getting enough money to launch their research programs or to get tenure. (Some institutions have responded by quietly relaxing their grant requirements for getting tenure.) In the 13 February 2012 post on her blog, Sally Rockey - then a senior administrator at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) - worried that the average age of principal investigators was increasing.

Two explanations for the aging of principal investigators were the end of mandatory retirement policies and the "fewer people entering the faculty at ages 28 and below" (which is a tactful reference to the recent near-requirement that faculty serve a post doc or two first). Here was the resulting graphic that Dr. Rockey posted on her blog:

But assistant professors might not agree that the mean age of principal investigators of grants awarded is increasing because assistant professors are getting older. And indeed, one new study observed a decline in the percentage of NIH grant proposals funded across all age groups:
Age GroupSuccess Rate in 1980Success Rate in 2014
Under 3546.1 %19.2 %
35 - 3948.7 %24.8 %
60 - 6445.0 %25.1 %
65 - 6951.3 %23.0 %

As reported in the Chronicle of Higher Education, the study published in Cell Stem Cell observed that younger researchers submit fewer proposals. "In the 1980s, more individuals under the age of 40 applied for an R01-equivalent award than today, and, over the years, the number of awardees and applicants under age 40 has decreased," said the report, which observed that this was primarily a problem of young male researchers (!).

The report did not go into what is going on, but we can guess. It takes something on the order of one to two hundred hours to prepare a grant proposal. For a young researcher on the tenure clock, that is a sizable block of time, and hence a gamble. Young researchers may be told that the trick to getting a grant is to submit applications - and they may be advised of Bishop Desmond Tutu's dictum that no effort is wasted - but there will be pressure to get in that one proposal (if that many) that is just right. As a result, there are fewer proposals.

For more on getting grants, see the Biweekly articles on Getting Grants on the Job, Grantsmanship, and Getting Real About Grants. (During the past year or so, we have run a series of articles on getting tenure: links to all the articles are on the front page of the UFF USF website.) Meanwhile, people reviewing the tenure guidelines may want to think about exactly how much weight should be put on a criterion that increasingly resembles a crapshoot.


Chapter Meeting tomorrow Friday, July 15, in Temple Terrace, at CDB Restaurant, 5104 E. Fowler Ave.

There will be pizza, salad, and drinks. All UFF members are invited to attend. Non-members are also invited to come and check us out. Come and join the movement.

Membership: Everyone in the UFF USF System Bargaining unit is eligible for UFF membership: to join, simply fill out and send in the membership form.

NOTE: The USF-UFF Chapter website is http://www.uff.ourusf.org, and our e-mail address is uff@ourusf.org.

About this broadcast: This Newsletter was broadcast from uff.ourusf.org, hosted at ICDsoft.com, and is intended for all members of the UFF USF Bargaining unit (USF faculty and professionals at most departments). A (usually identical) version will be broadcast to USF-News and USF-Talk from mccolm@usf.edu.

If you do not want to receive the UFF Biweekly, you can unsubscribe below. If you do not receive the Biweekly, but want to, e-mail a message to gmccolm@tampabay.rr.com.