UFF Home
UFF Biweekly
United Faculty of Florida -- USF System Chapter
12 September 2013
Email not displaying properly? View it in your browser


Chapter Meeting Next Friday, Sept. 20, at USF St. Petersburg (at 11 am)

There will be no chapter meeting tomorrow. Instead, the Chapter will meet next week at 11 am on USF St. Petersburg in the Student University Center's Ocean Room (second floor) for a Welcome Back Luncheon. Bring a colleague!

Then on Sept. 27, we will resume our regular schedule of meeting on alternate Fridays. The schedule for the rest of the semester is:

  • On the Fridays of September 27, October 11, November 8, and November 22, at 12 noon, we will meet on USF Tampa in EDU 161.
  • We will not meet tomorrow, Friday, September 13; instead, we will meet on Friday, September 20 at at 11 am (one hour early) in the Student University Center's Ocean Room (second floor) on USF St. Petersburg. The time change is to accommodate members attending the 1:30 pm meeting of the USFSP Faculty Senate after the Chapter meeting.
  • We will meet on Friday, October 25 at 12 noon on a location TBA on USF Sarasota / Manatee.
As always, there will be sandwiches, chips, and soda. All USF UFF employees, members and non-members, are invited: come and bring a friend!

Join UFF Today!

Download, fill in, and mail the membership form. Benefits of membership include the right to run and vote in UFF chapter and statewide elections; representation in grievances (UFF cannot represent a non-member in a grievance or litigation); special deals in insurance, travel, legal advice, and other packages provided by our affiliates; free insurance coverage for job-related liability; and the knowledge you are supporting education in Florida. AND YOU CAN JOIN NOW AND AS A DUES PAYING MEMBER, YOU WILL RECEIVE A $ 100 REBATE NEXT SPRING. Come and join the movement.


President Obama Proposes to Reform Higher Education

Late this summer, President Obama picked up the traditional American view of education as the door to opportunity and proposed several reforms in American higher education. Some were designed to provide consumer information and consumer protection for students and parents (and the federal government). Some innovations were enumerated and innovation was verbally encouraged - and some R & D funds were offered - but there didn't seem to be any greater federal regulations or resources en route. That would be up to the states.

  • Obama's Better Bargain. The proposal is part of a package called the "Better Bargain," and it consists of consumer information, encouragement of (largely technological) innovation, and doing something about student debt. For more, see below or click here.
  • Reactions to the Better Bargain. To the accountability crowd, it was about time. To critics of the accountability movement, it sounded a bit like No Child Left Behind. For more, see below or click here.
And now the ball goes to Congress, and speaking of Congress, Inside Higher Ed reports in Sequester Strains Science Researchers that fewer grants are being handed out, lab workers are being laid off, and students are looking at the mess and making plans to go ... elsewhere.

Obama's Better Bargain

On August 22, President Obama visited Henninger High School in Syracuse, New York, to talk about "What used to be taken for granted -- middle-class security". Citing some of the progress his administration has made in the last four years, he said that America had further to go, and the way to get there was education.

"The unemployment rate for Americans with at least a college degree is about a third lower than the national average. The incomes of people with at least a college degree are more than twice what the incomes are of Americans who don't have a high school diploma. So more than ever before, some form of higher education -- two year, four year, technical college -- that's the path into the middle class."

But cost is an obstacle. "Over the past three decades, the average tuition at a four-year public college has risen by more than 250 percent. The typical family income has gone up 16 percent...," so that the "...average student who borrows for college now graduates owing more than $26,000." He said that state legislatures are cutting higher education appropriations, colleges and universities are not controlling their own costs, and the federal government can't make up the difference. "Higher education," he said, "should not be a luxury."

He said that he would do three things:

  • "Number one, I'm directing my administration to come up with a new ratings system for colleges that will score colleges on opportunity - whether they're helping students from all kinds of backgrounds succeed; and on outcomes - whether students are graduating with manageable debt; whether they're actually graduating in the first place; whether they have strong career potential when they graduate."
  • "Our second goal: We want to encourage more colleges to embrace innovation, to try new ways of providing a great education without breaking the bank. A growing number of colleges across the country are testing some new approaches, so they're finding new ways, for example, to use online education to save time and money."
  • "Number three: We're going to make sure that if you've taken on debt to earn your degree that you can manage and afford it."
With that, the White House swung into action. The proposals were part of the Better Bargain for the Middle Class, which included Knowledge and Skills for the Jobs of the Future, and the slogan was to Make College More Affordable - which also was the title of the proposal's Fact Sheet. According to the Fact Sheet, Obama's three initiatives were: In essence, the federal government will encourage reforms to make higher education cheaper, and possibly more effective, but the new resources that the federal government will provide will be for R & D.

Reactions to the Better Bargain

The Obama administration was already working on reforming for-profit education, which includes a number of companies that have been preying on discharged veterans, and Inside Higher Ed observed that some of Obama's proposals resembled the sort of consumer-information and consumer-protection innovations directed at the for-profits: " An underlying goal both of those regulations and this plan is an attempt to judge colleges based on the 'value' they provide to students and taxpayers, based on a mix of student outcomes."

Obama's proposals were quickly endorsed by some public college leaders and academic celebrities, and some advocates of business models for higher education. The Chronicle of Higher Education detected the influence of several organizations, such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Meanwhile, institutions and their organizations and lobbyists scrambled to get into the decision-making loop.

The American Association of University Professors was unhappy, complaining that the consulting with educators planned by the Obama Administration will consist of talking with administrators, not faculty. Starting with college costs, the AAUP noted that the problem was not growth in faculty or faculty salaries (especially considering the replacement of retiring tenured faculty with cheap contingent adjuncts and instructors), but instead blamed declining state appropriations and growing administrative costs (both in salaries and in numbers of administrators).

In fact, one blogger at the Chronicle of Higher Education suggested that at least part of the problem was the rise in indebtedness of public research institutions that went into debt to construct facilities for marketing purposes.

Reality Check. One recurrent complaint was that Obama's proposals presumed that higher education served primarily vocational purposes. Academics have long criticized colleagues who trained their students to become job-seekers -- witness Socrates' complaints about the Sophists. But just as the Church founded schools a thousand years ago to train clerks -- and ambitious youngsters went to those proto-universities in pursuit of careers -- so governments today fund education for mundane reasons. Cardinal John Henry Newman's rationale for a university education -- ... the force, the steadiness, the comprehensiveness and the versatility of intellect, the command over our own powers, the instinctive just estimate of things as they pass before us, which sometimes indeed is a natural gift, but commonly is not gained without much effort and the exercise of years ... is not the reason kings and presidents have for creating these institutions. Thomas Jefferson's rationale, If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be is more compelling, but not to sufficiently cynical politicians (recall Herblock's quote of a senator wailing, "If people are to become educated and vote, what is to become of us?") Politicians fund higher education for economic reasons, and the American public supports higher education for economic reasons.

This proposal is a mix of micro-management, opportunities of improvement, and consumer rights, for students seeking opportunity and a nation seeking a skilled workforce. New America Foundation activist Kevin Carey may have a point when he argues that education lobbyists who simply respond with objections may fritter away any influence they have. It may be, as the AAUP contends, that this is a higher education version of No Child Left Behind - after all, New America's programs have received $ 4 million dollars from Gates and similar reformers. But the issues of cost are real, and while ideologues and charlatans sell their snake oil to politicians, educators are making real headway in developing teaching techniques. With a little bit of luck, we can persuade some of the more sensible politicians to support institutions (like USF!) that engage in educational research, without the ideological and special interest micromanagement.

NO CHAPTER MEETING TOMORROW FRIDAY. Chapter Meeting next week Friday, September 20, at 11 am in the Student University Center's Ocean Room (second floor) on USF St. Petersburg.

There will be free sandwiches, chips, and soda pop. All UFF members are invited to attend. Non-members are also invited to come and check us out. Come and join the movement.

Membership: Everyone in the UFF USF System Bargaining unit is eligible for UFF membership: to join, simply fill out and send in the membership form.

NOTE: The USF-UFF Chapter website is http://www.uff.ourusf.org, and our e-mail address is uff@ourusf.org.

About this broadcast: This Newsletter was broadcast from uff.ourusf.org, hosted at ICDsoft.com, and is intended for all members of the UFF USF Bargaining unit (USF faculty and professionals at most departments). A (usually identical) version will be broadcast to USF-News and USF-Talk from mccolm@usf.edu.

If you do not want to receive the UFF Biweekly, you can unsubscribe below. If you do not receive the Biweekly, but want to, e-mail a message to gmccolm@tampabay.rr.com.