UFF Home
UFF Biweekly
United Faculty of Florida -- USF System Chapter
29 August 2013
Email not displaying properly? View it in your browser

Chapter Meetings this Fall

This fall, we will be meeting approximately every two weeks, usually at USF Tampa in EDU 161, starting tomorrow Friday. Our schedule is:

  • On the Fridays of August 30, September 27, October 11, November 8, and November 22, at 12 noon, we will meet on USF Tampa in EDU 161.
  • We will not meet on Friday, September 13; instead, we will meet on Friday, September 20 at 11 am (one hour early) at a location TBA on USF St. Petersburg. The time change is to accommodate members attending the 1:30 pm meeting of the USFSP Faculty Senate after the Chapter meeting. That means that the next Biweekly will come out on Thursday, September 19.
  • We will meet on Friday, October 25 at 12 noon on a location TBA on USF Sarasota / Manatee.
As always, there will be sandwiches, chips, and soda. All USF UFF employees, members and non-members, are invited: come and bring a friend!

Welcome Back!

Every year, Beloit College welcomes faculty back with descriptions of the backgrounds of the incoming class. And this year, they remind us that to the incoming Class of 2017, "GM means food that is Genetically Modified," that "spray paint has never been legally sold in Chicago," that "Captain Janeway has always taken the USS Voyager where no woman or man has ever gone before," that "Java has never been just a cup of coffee," that "the U.S. has always imposed economic sanctions against Iran," and that "they have never seen the Bruins at Boston Garden, the Trailblazers at Memorial Coliseum, the Supersonics in Key Arena, or the Canucks at the Pacific Coliseum." Remember, they're not getting younger ... we're getting older.

From University Presidents to Washington

196 university presidents, including our own Judy Genshaft, have signed an open letter to President Obama and the 113th Congress appealing to them to close the innovation deficit.

Beginning with the warning that "Our nation’s role as the world’s innovation leader is in serious jeopardy," the presidents warn that eroding federal support for universities will lead to an "innovation deficit": "Ignoring the innovation deficit will have serious consequences: a less prepared, less highly skilled U.S. workforce, fewer U.S.-based scientific and technological breakthroughs, fewer U.S.-based patents, and fewer U.S. start-ups, products, and jobs."

(Editorial comment: while it is true that there is more to universities than STEM, the problem is that the politicians are not even supporting STEM (except rhetorically).)

The letter concludes with: "We call upon you to reject unsound budget cuts and recommit to strong and sustained investments in research and education. Only then can we ensure that our nation’s promise of a better tomorrow endures."

Join UFF Today!

Download, fill in, and mail the membership form. Benefits of membership include the right to run and vote in UFF chapter and statewide elections; representation in grievances (UFF cannot represent a non-member in a grievance or litigation); special deals in insurance, travel, legal advice, and other packages provided by our affiliates; free insurance coverage for job-related liability; and the knowledge you are supporting education in Florida. AND YOU CAN JOIN NOW AND AS A DUES PAYING MEMBER, YOU WILL RECEIVE A $ 100 REBATE NEXT SPRING. Come and join the movement.

Getting Tenure

This fall, at the request of the Provost, the USF Tampa Faculty Senate is composing recommendations for new tenure and promotion guidelines (applicable only to the Tampa campus as USF Sarasota / Manatee and USF St. Petersburg have the authority to determine their own tenure and promotion criteria and processes). Meanwhile, the United Faculty of Florida and the USF Board of Trustees are bargaining a new contract, and tenure is on the table. So this fall, and possibly this year, will see a lot of discussion about tenure.

Tenure procedures and criteria (these are two different things) were the topics of the previous Biweekly. In this issue, we get down to basics: what is tenure for, and how does one get tenure?

  • What Tenure is For. Tenure is not mere job security; it is a privilege and a responsibility originally intended for teachers. And nowadays, contractually defined and protected tenure is as important as ever. For more, see below or click here.
  • Getting Tenure. So how does one get tenure at a research university like USF? One critical component is demonstrating research productivity, and there is more to this than just vowing to publish lots. For more, see below or click here.

What Tenure is for

Scholars, judges, sages, jesters, and prophets have long enjoyed extraordinary freedoms to "speak truth to power," and they have long endured violations of those freedoms. Jeremiah was thrown into a pit, Galileo was put under house arrest, and a century ago, several American teachers and professors got fired for irritating boards of trustees or local politicians. Losing one's job is not as bad as being sent to Siberia - that's happened, too - but losing a job is bad enough. American faculty picked up an idea from the trade unions arising in that era: tenure.

Unions proposed tenure as job security for employees who had been on the job for many years. Academics proposed tenure as protection for teachers who would be otherwise fired for, say, teaching evolution (it's happened). Tenure was originally intended to protect teachers, although the fundamental proposal, the American Association of University Professors' 1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure, does mention research in passing. Considering the views of some politicians on research in climatology, cultural anthropology, paleontology, political science, and religious history, it's probably just as well that tenure apply to scholarship, too.

Then researchers discovered that tenure allows them to take risks. Suppose that a researcher thinks that a certain multi-year project will produce great things; even if the outcome is risky, the researcher isn't risking her job pursuing it.

But what is tenure? American judges have recently grown rather indifferent to the old immunities - except as they apply to judges - and several decisions have limited tenure protections. For example, in 2006, the U. S. Supreme Court ruled that a prosecutor could be disciplined for reporting police misconduct to a superior who didn't want to hear it (this was a California case, even if it sounds like Florida). Two justices on opposite sides of the issue agreed that the ruling should not be applied to academics, but ...

UC Irvine couldn't resist the temptation. Chemical Engineering Professor Juan Hong expressed his opinion on personnel matters while serving on a committee; he suffered in a merit pay increase and filed suit, the District Court ruled against him, and the Ninth Circuit ruled against Hong, noting that "It is far from clearly established today, much less in 2004 when the university officers voted on Hong’s merits increase, that university professors have a First Amendment right to comment on faculty administrative matters without retaliation. See Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410, 425 (2006)." (Richard Ceballos was the prosecutor who was upset about police mishandling affidavits.)

Hong v. Grant was only one of three cases that alarmed the Modern Language Association into warning that "until Garcetti v. Ceballos and its progeny are overturned, we recommend that all faculty senates at public colleges and universities revisit their institution’s definition of academic freedom, and we recommend that all public colleges and universities reaffirm the right of their faculty members to speak on matters of public concern—and matters pursuant to their official duties—without fear of retaliation."

UC Irvine has no faculty union. We do. Not only are tenure protections defined by the contract, but academic freedom for all faculty is protected by the contract. If an academic freedom case comes up, faculty are protected by contract law, and (let's face it) judges are a lot more respectful of contracts than they are of tenure. (Except, of course, for the tenure of judges.)

Florida is, of course, more bizarre than California, and a recent Florida example shows the value of faculty standing together. Last year, an adjunct at Florida Atlantic University who had been teaching a standard course using a standard text for years, faced an unhappy student who interpreted one of the class exercises as "stomping on Jesus." The student subsequently went to the press, politicians were outraged, and the FAU Administration promised never, ever, to permit this exercise to be conducted again, and put the adjunct on leave. Even though the teacher was only an adjunct, he was supported by the United Faculty of Florida and the FAU Faculty Senate, and FAU rehired him.

And there lies the reason why administrators should seek tenure for all teachers. It allows them to respond to a hyperventilating politicians with a regretful explanation that the administration can do nothing (which is frequently the best thing to do when politicians are hyperventilating). But this case is a reminder that this sort of thing can happen to any teacher at any time, and that administrators can panic in a crisis.

But all faculty in the UFF USF Bargaining Unit, tenured and untenured, have their academic freedom protected by the contract. That and the political clout we can wield by standing together is what will protect our ability to serve our students and our community with honest teaching and honest counsel.

Getting Tenure

Many assistant professors fail to gain tenure at research universities because of thin research / scholarship / creative works. The traditional view was that those who failed just didn't make the cut because they weren't good enough. But now that the study of academic performance has itself become an academic field, psychologists see tenure denial as a result of failure to perform to one's potential. And some see such failure as being as much a result of habits and skills as of intellectual ability. There is a spectrum of advice, increasingly based on empirical evidence. Here are two extremes:

Getting it done may require some experimentation.

In addition, since scholarly performance is measured by how much (and what kind) of attention one is getting, publications should be composed with an eye towards ... marketing. Compare, for example, Hermann Grassman and Willard Gibbs: Grassman developed something very close to what we call "vector algebra" and published unreadable and unread books, while decades later Gibbs presented his "vector algebra" in a series of articles largely aimed at his numerous correspondents. It is not enough to be published; one must be read. Indeed, nowadays, evaluation committees don't just count publications and weigh the prestige of the publishers; they also go to online databases and count citations and compute impact factors. It may be wise to learn some data mining and devote a little time to ... market research.

Considering the stakes, assistant professors may consider taking advantage of workshops offered at USF on various aspects of teaching and research. If you are an assistant professor, talk to colleagues and your chair; if your chair hired you, your chair has a vested interest in your success, and in addition, your chair is as familiar as anyone with the formal written (and, ahem, informal unwritten) criteria for tenure.

One major source of information is the annual evaluation, which comes out within thirty days of the end of the term in which the evaluation was made, which usually means by the end of June. This evaluation must provide information on progress towards tenure. Never be shy about asking a chair about an evaluation and its impact.

In addition, the tenure track has a major landmark. Section 15.3(B) of the Collective Bargaining Agreement provides for a mid-tenure review on the third or fourth year, and this serves as an important heads up on an assistant professor's progress towards tenure. One should not wait until then to review how one is doing - the university has been known to non-renew tenure-track faculty as a result of a poor mid-tenure review - one should track one's progress towards tenure starting on the first year.

And if there are any difficulties - if your annual evaluations are weird or missing, or something odd is happening in the mid-tenure review, or if something odd is happening with the tenure application - that's what UFF is here for. But join today, for UFF will only represent an employee who was a member at the time that the grievance occurred.

Chapter Meeting tomorrow Friday, August 30, at 12 noon in EDU 161 on USF Tampa.

There will be free sandwiches, chips, and soda pop. All UFF members are invited to attend. Non-members are also invited to come and check us out. Come and join the movement.

Membership: Everyone in the UFF USF System Bargaining unit is eligible for UFF membership: to join, simply fill out and send in the membership form.

NOTE: The USF-UFF Chapter website is http://www.uff.ourusf.org, and our e-mail address is uff@ourusf.org.

About this broadcast: This Newsletter was broadcast from uff.ourusf.org, hosted at ICDsoft.com, and is intended for all members of the UFF USF Bargaining unit (USF faculty and professionals at most departments). A (usually identical) version will be broadcast to USF-News and USF-Talk from mccolm@usf.edu.

If you do not want to receive the UFF Biweekly, you can unsubscribe below. If you do not receive the Biweekly, but want to, e-mail a message to gmccolm@tampabay.rr.com.